In
an interview with Mark Fischetti of Scientific American, Bill Mckimmon outlines
his beliefs that the quickly globalizing economy must become more localized. At
current consumption rates the Earth’s limited resources will be exhausted in
the near future. Mr. Mckimmon blames this on global distribution of resources.
Why would we produce wheat in Kansas and then ship it throughout the world?
While in some areas it may be advantageous to produce a single resource and
import the rest it may be more sustainable to become localized. By limiting the
transportation costs of food (as well as other resources) we would become less
dependent on fossil fuels. By forcing local farms to produce more food the
world’s agriculture would become more efficient. Developing countries may
benefit from this by becoming less dependent of developed nations. I believe
that Mr. Mckimmon is right in the fact that current resource distribution
methods are not sustainable. Something must be done to reduce the scale of the
global economy so that when the inevitable elimination of the Earth’s natural gas
resources does occur, we are ready for it.
According
to Wikipedia sustainability means “the capacity to endure.” When I took
Environmental Sustainability 200 we learned that sustainability was “the
ability to sustain our way of life indefinitely.” It is hard to believe that
something so difficult can be expressed in so few words. Sustainability is one
of the greatest challenges of the modern world. The Environmental Protection
Agency is working in conjunction with many other world agencies to move towards
a more sustainable world. If you go to their website you will see what the EPA
is doing to make our way of life more sustainable but the million dollar (or
should I say priceless) question is, are we doing enough?
No comments:
Post a Comment